2013 - ISODP 2013 Congress


Oral Presentation 8 on Living Donation

15.6 - Assessment of Potential Renal Donors Using Principles of the Amsterdam Forum: A Single Centre Review

Presenter: Jeremy R., Chapman, Westmead, Australia
Authors: Jeremy Chapman, Andrew Emerson, Philip O'Connell, Henry Pleass, Lincoln Dealtry


Assessment of Potential Renal Donors Using Principles of the Amsterdam Forum: A Single Centre Review

Jeremy Chapman1, Andrew Emerson1, Philip O'Connell1, Henry Pleass1, Lincoln Dealtry1

1westmead hospital, westmead, Australia

We reviewed the reasons for living renal donor exclusion at our centre following implementation of recommendations for assessment made at the Amsterdam forum. A retrospective audit was therefore undertaken of all 577 potential renal donors considered by our centre between 6 April 2004 and 20 September 2012. Potential renal donors were 18-70 years of age, and were all assessed to have an altruistic motivation for donating, and being able to consent for the procedure.

Results: 53 donors were rejected for non-medical reasons and 186 for medical reasons. The three most common single criteria reasons for donor exclusion were HLA sensitisation/incompatibility (15%), impaired renal function (13%) and impaired glucose tolerance (10%). Hypertension was the most common reason for donor exclusion when paired with other assessment criteria. There was an equal gender balance with 52% of actual donors being female. Assessed first degree relatives were less likely to proceed to donation than more distant relatives and spouses.

Conclusions. Introduction of the paired kidney exchange program and approaches to transplantation of ABO incompatible kidneys may reduce donor exclusion by 15%, but data on long term follow up of donors with marginal medical criteria for acceptance will be required before liberalising acceptance criteria could be considered. 


You must be logged in to view recordings

Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Our Corporate Sponsors

TTS gratefully acknowledges the Corporate Partners whose generous support makes the work of the Society possible:

  • astellas
  • roche
  • sanofi