2013 - ISODP 2013 Congress


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, ISODP. Log in to view.

Oral Presentation 14 on Management and Public Policy 2

30.2 - Family approach - retrospective analysis of 6617 donation requests

Presenter: Franz, Schaub, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Authors: Franz Schaub, Carl-Ludwig Fischer-Froehlich, Guenter Kirste

Family approach – retrospective analysis of 6617 donation requests

Franz Schaub1, Carl-Ludwig Fischer-Froehlich1, Guenter Kirste2

1Deutsche Stiftung Organstransplantation (DSO), Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2Universitätsklinik Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Introduction: The German Transplantation-Legislation was modified in November 2012 with promoting voluntary decision of people about organ donation. Despite the current national transplantation-scandal, citizens have a positive attitude towards organ donation. Even though the law now requires every citizen to enter their decision about organ donations in the minutes, the decedent’s written consent is missing most of times. Therefore donor families have to be approached about this specific issue. Thereby the refusal rate of 40% exceeds the ones of other countries. It was evaluated which factors might influence consent rate beyond personal decisions during donation requests.

Methods: 6.617 documented donation requests between the years 2009 and 2011 were analysed for factors that could influence the decisions beyond personal values.

Results: The decedent’s was often unknown (67.4%) and then the family’s decision was based on assumptions about the patient’s will. This resulted in 4.097 (61.9%) consents and 2.520 (38.1%) refusals. 4.669 (70.6%) of these donation-requests were done by the physician in charge only and 1.948 (29.4%) with a coordinator present additionally. Predictive (p<0.001) for consent were the presence of a specially trained transplantation coordinator and the timing of the request for organ donation (especially when the donation request was initiated in the time period when measures for certifying death by neurologic criteria were started, p<0.001).

Conclusion: There is a big difference between the attitude displayed in surveys and the real rate of consent to organ donation. The major challenge is that improved caregiving of donor family members is required. Donation requests should be done by trained physician as well as coordinators. Waiting until the finalized certification of brain death may not be appropriate nowadays: A transparent description of all detail contributes to build up a therapeutic relation to donor families and this allows them to have a proper timeframe for a stable decision about organ donation.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada