2013 - ISODP 2013 Congress


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, ISODP. Log in to view.

Oral Presentation 18 on Education and Communications 4

46.1 - Good Samaritan Kidney Donation: A Comparative Study Between New Zealand and Australia

Presenter: Kusam, Nagi, Sydney , Australia
Authors: Kusam Nagi, Moohambika Srinivasan, Piyumi B. Lekamlage, Katrina A. Bramstedt

Good Samaritan Kidney Donation: A Comparative Study Between New Zealand and Australia

Kusam Nagi1, Moohambika Srinivasan1, Piyumi B. Lekamlage1, Katrina A. Bramstedt1

1Bond University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Australia

Australia and New Zealand are trans-Tasman neighbours who share a British colonial heritage, but the similarities end when the topic turns to living organ donation.  We conducted a comparative study of the rates of Good Samaritan [altruistic] Kidney Donation and living donation (in general) in Australia and New Zealand.  Data was sourced from ANZDATA.  In the Oceania region, New Zealand pioneered the first Good Samaritan donation in 1998, with Australia following with their first Good Samaritan donation six years later, in 2004.  Our analysis shows New Zealand outpacing Australia in the rates of both Good Samaritan kidney donation (statistically significant) and living donation in general (not statistically significant).  We pose three reasons for the disparity: 1. Website content analysis finds that every New Zealand hospital which offers Good Samaritan donation mentions “unrelated” or “altruistic” donation on their website (kappa 0.78; 3 raters) whereas only 2 of 15 Australian hospitals offering this procedure mention such on their website (prior study)[1]; 2. Since 2005, New Zealand has offered a financial safety net for living donors, namely, up to 12 weeks non-taxable financial assistance due to lost income and/or extra childcare costs, whereas Australia introduced a financial assistance plan only recently (July 2013, 6 weeks taxable paid leave); 3. Unlike Australia, with its numerous states, territories and policies, New Zealand is not carved into jurisdictional segments with multiple policies on donation, lending to a more streamlined approach. Only time will tell if the Australian paid leave program will have a significant impact on living donation rates.  A national Australian policy on Good Samaritan donation could potentially have a positive impact and should be trialled as a pilot.  Additionally, enhancing the content of Australian hospital websites might also raise community awareness about Good Samaritan donation.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada