2010 - TTS International Congress


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.

Epidemiology and Clinical Outcomes

100.10 - The influence of Different Erythropoietin Regimes on Hemoglobin at 1 month post transplant

Presenter: Yuvaram, Reddy, Chennai, India
Authors: Reddy Y., Reddy Y., Fathima N., Abraham G.

THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ERYTHROPOIETIN REGIMES ON HEMOGLOBIN AT 1 MONTH POST TRANSPLANT

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES

Y. Reddy1, Y. Reddy2, N. Fathima2, G. Abraham2
1Nephrology, Madras Medical Mission, Chennai/INDIA, 2Dialysis And Renal Transplantation, Madras Medical Mission, CHENNAI/INDIA

Body: Introduction: Anemia is a well known complication of chronic kidney disease due, at least in part, to decreased erythropoietin secretion by the diseased kidney. This prospective observational study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of three different erythropoietin regimes for raising hemoglobin following renal transplantation. Materials and methods: The charts of 77 patients transplanted between 2006 and 2009 in a tertiary care institution were retrospectively collected. Group A received Mircera (100 mcg stat s/c) (n=25), Group B received Epoetin 10000 units on the first,third and eight day(n=26) and Group C received Epoetin 2000 units twice a week(n=26). Baseline demograhic variables and hemoglobin were collected before transplantation and a month after transplantation. Results: Hb in group A fell from 10.8+1.8 g/dl before transplantation to 9.4+2.0 g/dl one month after transplantation with a mean fall of 1.4(p=0.05). Hb in group B was 9.5+1.5 g/dl before transplantation and was 9.6+2.1g/dl one month after transplantation with a mean rise of 0.14 (p=.746). Hb in group C was 9.5+1.7 g/dl before transplantation and 9.5+1.6 g/dl one month after transplantation with a mean rise of 0.1 (p=.973). Conclusion: Mircera was not as efficacious as Epoetin 10000 on the first, third and eight day or Epoetin 2000 twice a week in raising Hemoglobin 1 month after renal transplantation. There was no significant difference between Epoetin 10000 and Epoetin 2000. (p=.988)

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada