2011 - IPITA - Prague


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, IPITA. Log in to view.

Parallel session 5 – Open mini-oral presentations Topic: Pancreas transplantation

5.6 - Portal v. sytemic drainage of solitary pancreas transplantation: new views on old concepts

Presenter: M., Cooper, Baltimore, USA
Authors: M. Cooper, J. Scalea, R. Barth, S. Fayek, J. Bromberg, B. Philosophe, S. Bartlett


Portal v. sytemic drainage of solitary pancreas transplantation: new views on old concepts

M. Cooper, J. Scalea, R. Barth, S. Fayek, J. Bromberg, B. Philosophe, S. Bartlett
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Surgery, Baltimore, USA

Objective: Venous outflow in pancreas transplantation may be via the systemic (SV) or portal (PV) circulation. Initial reports from our institution demonstrated improved graft survival via PV thought due, in part, to decreased incidence of acute rejection. As technical and immunologic improvements have been made over last decade, a review of outcomes between these methods was necessary.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken to evaluate various outcome variables for patients that underwent pancreas transplantation over the last 10 years (2000-2010). Cox regression and student’s t-test was used to determine significance.

Results: Sixty-five patients were evaluated. 18 patients underwent systemic drainage; 15 via iliac vein, 3 via IVC, and 47 underwent portal drainage via the SMV. 11/18 patients that underwent SV had a prior transplant (pancreas or kidney). Overall mean recipient age was 46.7 yr, mean donor age was 24.1 yr, mean BMI at transplant was 26.1 kg/m2 and 53.8% were women without statistical differences between groups. CIT (mean 19.4 hrs) and degree of HLA mismatch was also similar between groups. All patients received Thymoglobulin induction and equivalent maintenance IS. Overall one-year graft survival for patients was 89.4%; four patients (4PV) lost grafts due to early acute rejection, and 5 grafts (4PV, 1SV) lost to thrombosis. Seven grafts required pancreatectomy; all were PV. Rates of acute rejection were 17% SV v 21% PV (p=NS). Mean graft survival was 2.10 yr longer for patients that had PV vs. SV (p<0.01). Overall mean serum creatinine pre-transplantation was 1.09 mg/dL vs. 1.45 mg/dL (p<0.01) at 4.1 +2.3 yrs. There were no statistically significant differences in creatinine between PV v SV at any point.

Conclusion: Despite equivalence in overall allograft rejection and an increased rate of early technical complications with PV, a survival advantage continues to be demonstrated in PV solid organ pancreas transplant recipients.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada