2011 - ISBTS 2011 Symposium


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, ITA. Log in to view.

Oral Communications 3: Nutrition Outcomes

5.122 - Setting up a new multidisciplinary intestinal failure assessment centre

Presenter: Jutta, Koeglmeier, London, United Kingdom
Authors: Jutta Koglmeier1, Susan Hill1, Mamoun Elawad1, Jonathan Hind2, Anil Dhawan2, Neil Shah1

122
Setting up a new multidisciplinary intestinal failure assessment centre

Jutta Koglmeier1, Susan Hill1, Mamoun Elawad1, Jonathan Hind2, Anil Dhawan2, Neil Shah1

1Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 2Paediatric Hepatology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Background: Over the last 20 years the incidence of intestinal failure (IF) in children has constantly increased in the United Kingdom. This is due to better survival rates of extremely premature infants and the increase in conditions such as gastroschisis, but also because of better management of structural, inflammatory and motility disorders leading to the need for long term parenteral nutrition (PN). At present around 150 British children are managed on home PN. Although an effective intervention, life- threatening complications commonly arise in those with prolonged PN dependency.

A new multidisciplinary Intestinal Failure Assessment Centre (IFAC) was hence nationally commissioned. Clinical services started in April 2008. Referrals for children for possible small bowel (SBT) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) are accepted.

Aims: We aimed to indentify all patients who were referred for IF assessment and document their outcome.

Method: Details of the children referred were obtained from the IFAC database.

Results: A total of 45 children were referred. 31/45 underwent assessment for SBT and 14/45 for BMT. 5/45 children underwent SBT, 6/45 children are currently on the waiting list for SBT. 5/45 patients underwent BMT with 7/45 children awaiting transplantation. 12/45 did not fulfill the criteria for SBT and remain on PN. 6/45 successfully weaned off PN with improved clinical management, 2/45 are off PN on complex immunosuppressive therapy.

Two families declined the SBT offer.1 child died post SBT (severe graft rejection), 1 child died post BMT (respiratory failure unrelated to BMT). No patient died on the waiting list.

Conclusion: The multidisciplinary IFAC offer children with life threatening complications treatment options in the form of SBT or BMA with the potential for good long term outcome. Improved medical management initiated in a highly specialist centre can prevent the need for transplantation in a significant proportion of patients.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada