This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.
Presenter: M, First, Deerfield, United States
Authors: Dhadda S., Croy R., Fitzsimmons W., Holman J., First M.
COMPLICATIONS - METABOLIC
S. Dhadda, W. Fitzsimmons, R. Croy, J. Holman, M.R. First
Development, Astellas Pharma, Deerfield/IL/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Body: Introduction: New-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) is a common occurrence. Prior definitions of NODAT have been inconsistent. Based on past definitions and the recently proposed ADA criteria, we propose a new definition of NODAT.
METHODS: Analysis of 1433 at-risk transplant recipients was performed. These data were from 3 de novo Astellas sponsored, registration transplant studies (2 kidney;1 liver) evaluating NODAT in 637 at-risk patients receiving tacrolimus extended release (Advagraf), 642 at-risk patients receiving tacrolimus (Prograf), and 154 at-risk patients receiving cyclosporine (Neoral). NODAT was defined as a composite endpoint consisting of first occurrence of one of 4 parameters: (1) Two fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels > 126 mg/dL 30> days apart. (2) Oral hypoglycemic agent use for 30> consecutive days. (3) Insulin therapy for > 30 consecutive days and (4) HgbA1c >6.5%.
RESULTS: Results are illustrated below. Use of composite definition for NODAT is recommended. NODAT incidence was higher with tacrolimus formulations than cyclosporine; however, there were no differences in the incidence of NODAT between the 2 tacrolimus formulations in any of the parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analyses, the ADA criterion of a single FPG≥126 mg/dL is too sensitive in transplant recipients. Likewise, two FPG≥126 mg/dL was a frequent occurrence in the early post transplant period. The older definition of insulin use of ≥30 days underestimates the true incidence of NODAT. We propose the definition of NODAT should incorporate broader criteria. Use of appropriate definitions for NODAT provides for a better understanding of the incidence of this complication and may lead to earlier initiation of therapy.
Study | Prograf | Advagraf | Neoral | |
Kidney | Composite NODAT | 35.1%* | 35.8%* | 17.8% |
≥2 FPG ≥126 mg/dL ≥ 30 consecutive days apart | 23.2%* | 25.9%* | 11.8% | |
Oral hypoglycemic ≥30 consecutive days | 8.6%* | 13.6%* | 2.6% | |
Insulin ≥30 consecutive days | 7.9% | 6.2% | 3.9% | |
HgbA1c ≥6.5% | 21.9%* | 19.1%* | 8.6% | |
≥1 (or ≥2 ) FPG ≥126 mg/dL at any time | 68.4%(53.3%*) | 65.9%(40.2%) | 64.9%(39.0%) | |
Kidney | Composite NODAT | 30.1% | 36.5% | |
≥2 FPG ≥126 mg/dL ≥ 30 consecutive days apart | 15.7% | 17.7% | ||
Oral hypoglycemic ≥30 consecutive days | 7.7% | 6.9% | ||
Insulin ≥30 consecutive days | 9.7% | 10.1% | ||
HgbA1c ≥6.5% | 13.0% | 16.7% | ||
≥1 (or ≥2 ) FPG ≥126 mg/dL at any time | 56.7%(22.3%) | 61.3%(25.3%) | ||
Liver | Composite NODAT | 44.6% | 44.4% | |
≥2 FPG ≥126 mg/dL ≥ 30 consecutive days apart | 24.5% | 26.1% | ||
Oral hypoglycemic ≥30 consecutive days | 4.9% | 5.6% | ||
Insulin ≥30 consecutive days | 28.8% | 30.0% | ||
HgbA1c ≥6.5% | 9.2% | 9.4% | ||
≥1 (or ≥2 ) FPG ≥126 mg/dL at any time | 85.4%(51.9%) | 80.1%(53.0%) |
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:
The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada