2017 - CIRTA


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, ITA. Log in to view.

8- Immunological Monitoring, Rejection, and Mechanisms of Regeneration

36.13 - Donor specific antibodies in intestinal transplant recipients from two UK centres may be associated with more severe acute rejection but do not impact upon chronic rejection or mortality

Presenter: Holly, Blair, Twickenham, United Kingdom
Authors: Holly Blair, Carly Bambridge, Olivia Shaw, Andrew Butler, Lisa Sharkey, Jonathan Hind

Donor specific antibodies in intestinal transplant recipients from two UK centres may be associated with more severe acute rejection but do not impact upon chronic rejection or mortality

Holly Blair1, Carly Bambridge1, Olivia Shaw2, Andrew Butler3, Lisa Sharkey3, Jonathan Hind1.

1Liver, GI and Nutrition Centre, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 2Clinical Transplantation Laboratory, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 3Cambridge Transplant Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Introduction: Donor specific antibodies (DSA) are implicated in poor renal transplant outcome, however their impact in intestinal transplantation (ITx) is not fully understood. DSA data is collected in all UK centres, but has not yet been combined or collected centrally.

Aim: To identify the impact of DSA on episodes of rejection and graft loss post ITx. To begin collaboration in DSA data collection between centres in the UK.

Method: A retrospective case note and laboratory data review of all patients transplanted in one paediatric and one adult ITx centre between 2008-2016.

Results: 91 transplants were performed in 83 patients (66 adults, 17 children).

DSA: 18 (21.6%) patients were DSA positive (16 adults, 2 children (24.2% and 11.7% respectively)). 56% of these had at least one episode of rejection.
5 patients had preformed DSA of which 3 persisted.  60% of patients with preformed DSA had rejection, this represented 12.5% of all patients with rejection.
13 patients developed DSA de novo after ITx. They cleared in 3 patients. 54% of patients with de novo DSA had rejection, this represented 29.1% of all patients with rejection. In 71.5% of cases, the de novo DSA were identified before the onset of rejection.
Of those without DSA, 18% had at least one episode of rejection.
Mortality in those DSA positive was 22.2%. Mortality in those without DSA was 38.4%.

Rejection: 24 (28.9%) patients had at least one episode of acute rejection.
Of those with rejection, 10 (42%) had previously identified DSA. 2 further patients developed DSA after the episode of rejection.
7 adult patients had rejection directly following a change in immunosuppression or a period of non-adherence. 2 of these were DSA positive.
6 of the rejection group had severe rejection defined on histology; 4 of these were DSA positive.
6 grafts were lost due to rejection; 2 of these patients had DSA.
3 patients developed chronic rejection; none had DSA.

Conclusions: DSA positivity did not increase the risk of chronic rejection, nor did it adversely affect mortality. However, there was a trend to increased likelihood of acute rejection and increased severity of rejection episodes in those with previously identified preformed or de novo DSA.

Despite the collaboration between two ITx centres, numbers are small. There is a need to collaborate further to collect prospective data which may inform future DSA management.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada