This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.
Presenter: Henkie, Tan, ,
Authors: Tan H., CHAUDHARY A., Humar A., DONALDSON J., Basu A., Morgan C., UNRUH m., McCauley J., Wu C., Shah N., Randhawa P., Shapiro R.
INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION
H.P. Tan1, A. Chaudhary2, A. Humar3, J. Donaldson1, A. Basu1, C. Morgan1, M. Unruh4, J. Mccauley4, C. Wu4, N. Shah5, P. Randhawa6, R. Shapiro1
1Surgery / Transplant, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Pittsburgh/PA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2Transplant Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Pittsburgh/PA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 3Department Of Surgery, Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, Pittsburgh/PA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 4Nephrology, UPMC, Pittsburgh/PA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5Internal Medicine/nephrology, UPMC, Pittsburgh/PA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 6Pathology, UPMC, Pittsburgh/PA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Body: Introduction: To determine the consequence of weaning or not weaning of tacrolimus monotherapy in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) performed under alemtuzumab (Campath-1H, anti-CD52) pretreatment.
Methods: We used clinical data (including ELISA antibody titers, Cylex T cell activation assays, identification of DSA, and C4d stains) to wean Tacrolimus when possible at 6 months post transplant and every 2 to 6 months interval (bid-->qd-->qod-->tiw-->biw-->qwk). Spaced weaning was put on temporary hold beginning in Mar 2007. We compared our results with a matched group of the same number of patients in whom weaning and no weaning of tacrolimus monotherapy was attempted and the advantages and disadvantages of this strategy were evaluated, with a particular emphasis on recipient death, graft loss, graft function and acute rejection characteristics.
Results:
Weaning of Tacrolimus Monotherapy | Tacrolimus Monotherapy Not Weaned | |
Total number of patients | 150 | 149 |
Adult | 136 (90.7%) | 120 (80.7%) |
Pediatric | 14 (9.3%) | 29 (19.3%) |
Transplants performed between | 5/16/05 to 2/28/07 | 3/5/07 to 3/11/09 |
Mean follow up time (months) | 41.8 ±23.7 | 20.4 ± 7.8 |
Age (Yrs) | 42.9 ±18.70 | 40.6 ±20.79 |
Female | 49 (32.7%) | 51 (34.0%) |
African American | 18 (12.0%) | 7 (4.7%) |
>= 70 yrs old | 10 (6.7%) | 11 (7.3%) |
Re-transplants | 25 (16.7%) | 20 (13.3%) |
1 YR Survival (Pat / Graft) | 97.3% / 97.3% | 97.9% / 96.0% |
2 YR Survival (Pat / Graft) | 94.0% / 90.0% | 97.9% / 95.0% |
Creat 1 YR (n=145) | 1.47 ±0.60 | 1.32 ±0.47 |
Creat 2 YR (n=134) | 1.59 ±0.88 | 1.33 ±0.50 |
GFR 1 YR (n=145) | 57.4 ±20.4 | 63.3 ±29.1 |
GFR 2 YR (n=134) | 53.7 ±19.3 | 62.0 ±28.9 |
GFR 3 YR (n=125) | 52.7 ±20.1 | -- |
GFR 4 YR (n=65) | 54.7 ±17.6 | -- |
Acute rejection at 1YR | 8.7% | 7.3% |
Acute rejection at 2YR | 16.7% | 11.3% |
Recipients on or more maintenance immunosuppression therapy (eg tacrolimus plus MMF) | 22 (14.7%) | 17 (11.4%) |
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:
The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada