2010 - TTS International Congress


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.

Late Breaking I

96.1 - A Novel Device for Longer Term LVAD Support – Single Centre Experience with HeartWare

Presenter: Stephan, Schueler, Newcastle upon Tyne,
Authors: Özalp F., Butt T., Wrightson N., Pillay T., O'Leary D., MacGowan G., Schueler S.

A NOVEL DEVICE FOR LONGER TERM LVAD SUPPORT – SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE WITH HEARTWARE

LATE BREAKING I

F. Özalp1, T. Butt2, N. Wrightson1, T. Pillay1, D. O'leary1, G. Macgowan1, S. Schueler1
1Cardiopulmonary Transplantation, NUTH, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne/UNITED KINGDOM, 2Cardiopulmonary Transplantation, NUTH, Newcastle upon Tyne/UNITED KINGDOM

Body: INTRODUCTION: A new long-term device has been introduced recently for bridge to transplantation in end stage heart failure patients. METHODS: Our experience is based on 22 patients from July 2009 toJune 2010 with an average time on support of 120 days ranging from 1 to 311 days and a total of 2645 days. The underlying cadriomyopathy was dilated in 12, ischaemic in 6, familial in 2, restrictivein one and hypertrophic in one patient. Age ranged from 13 to 66 yrs. Postoperative anticoagulation consisted of Heparin switched to long term Warfarin and anti platelet agents monitored by TEGmapping. We have a very low threshold for hospital readmission. RESULTS: Implant procedures were technically feasible and the device could be accommodated entirely within the pericardium even inchildren. No mechanical RV support was necessary. Survival was 77% (17/22), 3 patients died early two with MOF and one with perioperative brain stem infarct. One patient died after 6 months due tochronic RV failure and one patient after 6 months due to thromboembolic stroke. One patient was successfully transplanted. Hospital readmission occurred in 8(36%) patients. There was one incident ofupper GI-Bleed (4,5%) 2 weeks post-op requiring blood transfusion. Driveline infections occurred in 3 (14%) patients requiring antimicrobial/surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This new LVAD is asafe and reliable longer-term implantable device. Implantation is significantly less traumatic than in some other devices. Hospital readmission rate is equivalent to the one after hearttransplantation. In our VAD program the HeartWare system is the device of choice for bridge to transplantation. Broader application as destination and extension of life therapy should be considered.

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada