2013 - ISBTS 2013 Symposium


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, IXA, ITA. Log in to view.

Posters and Exhibition

15.4 - Gastroschisis related intestinal failure: Does it increase risk for intestinal transplantation?

Presenter: Vinay, Bandla, , United States
Authors: Vinay Bandla1, Jane Zhao2, Alex Olsen1,1,2, Cynthia Bell1,3, Essam Imseis1, Stacey Moore-Olufemi2

Gastroschisis related intestinal failure: Does it increase risk for intestinal transplantation?

Vinay Bandla1, Jane Zhao2, Alex Olsen1,1,2, Cynthia Bell1,3, Essam Imseis1, Stacey Moore-Olufemi2

1Pediatric Gastroenterology , UT Houston, Houston, TX, United States; 1Hepatobiliary, Pancreas, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan; 1Gastroenterology and Intestinal Failure, Beaujon hospital, Clichy, No, France; 1Gastroenterology and Intestinal Failure, Beaujon hospital, Clichy, No, France; 2Pediatric Surgery, UT Houston, Houston, TX, United States; 3Biostatistics, UT Houston, Houston, TX, United States

Aim of the study: Gastroschisis is known to result in intestinal failure (IF) and is the leading cause of intestinal transplantation (IT) in the US today. The purpose of this study was to look at the development of IF and need for transplantation among simple and complex gastroschisis patients.
 
Methods:  We conducted a retrospective review from 2004-2012 of a prospective gastroschisis database maintained at our institution. 89 patients were identified and categorized into simple (intact, uncompromised continuous bowel) and complex (perforation, necrosis or atresia) gastroschisis. We evaluated the following outcomes: development of IF (> 60 days of TPN), need for IT, time to reach autonomous enteral feeds, duration of hospital stay, sepsis related events and death. Results are expressed in terms of standard error of mean, confidence intervals (CI) and interquartile ranges (IQR)
 
Main Results: 20% of the 89 infants in our cohort with gastroschisis were categorized to the complex group. 80% of the complex gastroschisis patients developed IF vs 12% in the simple group (p<.001). There was no difference in development of IF between those with primary v delayed closure (p=.17). The Complex gastroschisis patients had a significantly longer duration of TPN(106 days CI (73-248) (Fig.1) and hospital stays (139.5 days (IQR 55, 255)) when compared to the simple group (TPN: 24 days (CI 20-30) hospital stay: 32 (IQR 23, 45)). There was significantly more sepsis-related events among the complex group (p=0.003); however there was no difference in the 30-day mortality.
 
Conclusions: Complex gastroschisis patients have a higher incidence of IF and sepsis related events. No one in our cohort needed transplantation. This data suggests that we need more prospective studies to properly identify which cohort of gastroschisis  patients go on to IT.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada