This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.
Presenter: Brian, Goh, Rochester, United States
Authors: Goh B., Dean P., Raghavaiah S., Stegall M.
NEW IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENTS
B.K.P. Goh, P.G. Dean, S. Raghavaiah, M.D. Stegall
Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester/MN/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Body: Introduction: The mechanism of T-cell depletion by rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) has been shown in vitro to be due to apoptosis and complement-mediated cell lysis. Recently, Eculizumab; a potent terminal complement inhibitor has been shown to be potentially useful in reducing acute humoral rejection in patients undergoing positive crossmatch kidney transplantation (+XMKTx). Thus, Eculizumab might reduce the efficacy of rATG by inhibiting complement-mediated cell death of lymphocytes. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Eculizumab on the efficacy of rATG and hence determine the role of complement in rATG-induced lymphocyte cell death in +XMKTx. Methods: 56 patients who underwent kidney transplant were classified into 4 groups according to their induction regimen including: Group A: rATG induction alone, (1.5 mg/kg on days 0, 1, 2. 4); Group B: +XMKTx induced with rATG plus Eculizumab, (1.3 mg/m2 on day 0, 1); Group C: +XMKTx induced with rATG alone and a Control group: induction with Basiliximab alone. Peripheral blood T-cell subsets were measured 3-4 days after transplant (after 3 doses of rATG) and compared. Results: Terminal complement was completely blocked in eculizumab patients as determined by red blood cell lysis assays. Compared to no-rATG induction, groups A, B and C lead to significant depletion of all T-cell subsets. However, patients in group B (Eculizumab) had a small, but significant increase in total T cells compared to groups A and C. Importantly, only 1 of the rATG + eculizumab treated patients developed cellular rejection.
Group A (rATG) N =20 | Group B (+XMKTx -rATG + Eculizumab) N = 8 | Group C (+XMKTx - rATG) N = 20 | Control (Basilixumab) N = 8 | P-value (A vs B) | P-value (A vs C) | P-value (B vs C) | |
CD45, 1000 cell/uL | 0.103 ± .017 | 0.215 ± .037 | 0.096 ± .017 | 0.914 ± .090 | .005 | .757 | .002 |
CD3, cells/uL | 8.95 ± 1.68 | 22.5 ± 4.63 | 8.05 ± 2.04 | 583.0 ± 77.9 | .023 | .736 | .003 |
CD4, cells/uL | 4.60 ± 0.925 | 9.63 ± 1.388 | 1.85 ± 0.48 | 310.5 ± 55.0 | .007 | .011 | .001 |
CD8, cells/uL | 6.55 ± 1.12 | 13.75 ± 4.05 | 5.50 ± 1.53 | 259 ± 45.5 | .027 | .583 | .026 |
CD16+ CD56, cells/uL | 4.70 ± 0.798 | 6.38 ± 1.70 | 8.10 ± 1.80 | 122 ± 31.2 | .319 | .096 | .578 |
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:
The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada