2010 - TTS International Congress


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.

Activation and Role of T Regulatory Cells

136.9 - Regulatory T cells and Th17 T cell responses in the control of autoantibody-mediated allograft vasculopathy.

Presenter: Ines, Harper, Cambridge,
Authors: Harper I., Saeb-Parsy K., Callaghan C., Motallebzadeh R., Bolton E., Bradley J., Pettigrew G.

REGULATORY T CELLS AND TH17 T CELL RESPONSES IN THE CONTROL OF AUTOANTIBODY-MEDIATED ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY.

ACTIVATION AND ROLE OF T REGULATORY CELLS

I.G. Harper1, K. Saeb-parsy1, C.J. Callaghan2, R. Motallebzadeh1, E.M. Bolton1, J.A. Bradley3, G.J. Pettigrew2
1Department Of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM, 2Department Of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM, 3Transplant Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge/UNITED KINGDOM

Body: Introduction We have recently reported a role for autoantibody in the development of mouse heart graft vasculopathy that was surprisingly dependent upon donor CD4 T cells within the heart graft for its development. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are important in protection against autoimmunity but in the presence of IL-6, their differentiation is instead skewed to a Th17 response, which may exacerbate disease. Here we examine the inverse reciprocal arrangement between the development of Th17 and Tregs in the development of autoantibody and allograft vasculopathy (AV). Methods The contribution of Tregs and Th17 T cells to AV and autoantibody development was studied in an MHC II-mismatched mouse model of heart transplantation, by treating recipients with either anti-CD25 (PC61 i.p. on day -1, 1, 3, 5, 7) or anti-IL-17 antibody (50μg i.v. on day 1,3,5 and weekly thereafter) and by adoptive transfer the day after transplant of naturally occurring CD25+ve Tregs (nTregs) (purified from either donor or recipient strains). Graft survival was assessed by daily palpation and autoantibody production assayed by indirect immunofluorescence of nuclear-antigen-expressing HEp-2 cells. Results Anti IL-17 treatment of B6 recipients of bm12 hearts influenced neither development of autoantibody nor progression of AV. In contrast, depleting recipient Tregs markedly exacerbated autoantibody production and accelerated graft rejection (MST 20d vs. WT 95d). Heart grafts from CD4-T cell-depleted donors provoked significantly less autoantibody and survived longer (MST , p<0.01) than unmanipulated hearts in the Treg-depleted recipients, indicating that accelerated rejection following Treg depletion is partly due to exacerbation of humoral autoimmunity. Surprisingly, whereas adoptive transfer of recipient (B6) nTregs influenced neither autoantibody production nor allograft survival, transfer of donor (bm12) nTregs abrogated autoantibody and grafts survived indefinitely. Severity of AV in those recipients that received B6 nTregs was comparable to WT controls (mean intimal stenosis 70.29% ), whereas all allograft vessels in recipients that received bm12 nTregs were disease free. Conclusion Our results demonstrate a previously unrealized mechanism whereby Tregs contribute to graft survival by preventing effector autoantibody responses. We hypothesise that donor nTregs are more effective than recipient Tregs at preventing graft-versus-host mediated autoimmunity because they recognise the same target ligand (MHC class II on host autoreactive B cells) as is recognised by the population of donor, helper CD25-ve CD4 T cells that are passengers within the heart .

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada