ACCESS TO TREATMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE

K. Ladin¹, Y. Chretrien², E. Langnas¹, J.R. Rodrigue¹, M. Pavlakis¹, D. Mandelbrot³, D.W. Hanto^4
1Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston/MA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ²Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge/MA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ³Transplant Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ⁴Transplant Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston/MA/UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Body: Introduction: Despite being the optimal treatment for End-Stage Renal Disease and the favorable cost-benefit ratio, disparities in living-donor kidney transplantation persist. While age-based disparities are pervasive, the relationship between age of recipient and donor willingness and eligibility remain unexplored. Though clinicians often observe that older patients wait longer and have fewer living donors, this has not been documented thus far. Methods: Sample included 752 recipients (1450 person-years-on-study) and 654 donors evaluated between 2004 and 2008. Using two endpoints: (1) presentation of potential donor for evaluation, and (2) LDKT, we compared the time between recipient evaluation and either the endpoint or censoring by race. Parametric survival models estimated time until first potential donor presentation, adjusting for socio-demographic, medical, and network variables. Results: We stratified recipients by age at evaluation into five categories: younger than 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70 or older. Among these categories, the respective proportions who had at least a single potential donor within 1 year were 0.47, 0.43, 0.42, 0.30, and 0.21 (p <0.001). Following age 60, patients the rate of donor presentation drops precipitously, indicating a shift in willingness of donor, recipients, or both.
Conclusion: Disparities in rates of donor presentation track with age and cannot be explained by differences in measured covariates. Qualitative analysis is needed to examine whether low donationrates for elders is driven by lower willingness of potential donors to donate based on recipient age (fair innings) or lower willingness of patients to request or accept donations from youngerpeople.

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.