2011 - IPITA - Prague


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS, IPITA. Log in to view.

Parallel session 16 – Open oral presentations Topic: Islet xenotransplantation

16.6 - Managing potential zoonotic infections in swine-to-human islet xenotransplants

Presenter: O., Garkavenko, Auckland, New Zealand
Authors: O. Garkavenko, D. Nathu, S. Wynyard, K. Durbin, R.B. Elliott


Managing potential zoonotic infections in swine-to-human islet xenotransplants

O. Garkavenko, D. Nathu, S. Wynyard, K. Durbin, R.B. Elliott
Living Cell Technologies, Auckland, New Zealand

Inxenotransplantation the area of concern is the diseases that may be transmittedto the recipient via the donor’s tissue.

Objective: The main objective of the study was to assessthe microbiological safety of swine-to-human islets xenotransplantation in donorpigs and 14 Type 1 diabetic patients in the New Zealand clinical trial.

Method: Directmethods for zoonotic pathogensidentifications such as PCR and High Resolution Melting Analysis (HRM) has beenused in the study. The pathogen screening list for donor pigs includes22 pathogens. Cellcultures susceptible for eco- and xenotropic pig endogenous retrovirus (PERV)such as HEK 293, MV1LU, ST. IOWA were used to assess infectious characteristicsof the virus. Fourteen diabetic patients were transplanted with alginate/polyornithinemicroencapsulated neonatal porcine islets with doses from 5000IEQ to 20000IEQ/kg.The patients were tested for the evidence of the xenotic infections at multipletime points by PCR using HRM and serology assays for swine infectious agentsincluding PERV.

Results: Large scale pre-clinical monitoring of the NewZealand pig population has been performed. A suitable source herd for islettransplantation has been identified and maintained. Donor pigs used in the study were free fromall tested potentially xenotic agents including infectious PERV. Assays for pig viruses have been developed andimplemented in long-term patient follow -up. Both qPCR and serology assays for PERV and all other pig viruses did notshow any evidence of infectious agents’ transmission in swine-to-humanxenotransplantation.

Conclusions: Extensive monitoring program for screening ofswine pathogens was developed and implemented for the New Zealand pigpopulation. The program is successful in identifying and maintaining the donorherd as suitable for islet transplantation. Assays for swine virusesidentification have been used to screen patients following isletxenotransplantation. There was no evidence of swine infection transmission.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada