This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.
Presenter: Gopal, Basu, Vellore, India
Authors: Basu G., Annapandian V., Matthew B., Saravanakumar K., Mohapatra A., David V., Sundaram M., Varughese S., Fleming D., Tamilarasi V., Jacob C., John G.
USE OF MTOR INHIBITORS AND MPA II
G. Basu1, V.M. Annapandian1, B.S. Matthew2, K. Saravanakumar2, A. Mohapatra1, V.G. David1, M. Sundaram1, S. Varughese1, D.H. Fleming2, V. Tamilarasi1, C.K. Jacob1, G.T. John1
1Nephrology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Vellore/INDIA, 2Clinical Pharmocology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Vellore/INDIA
Body: Background: Weight based dose of mycophenolate has been recommended for renal transplantation. Aim: To determine the relationship between the outcome events and weight adjusted mycophenolate (MPA) dose and drug exposure (AUC) among renal allograft recipients. Patients & methods: Renal allograft recipients, who underwent transplantation at Christian Medical College Vellore, between January 2003 and December 2009, and received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) /sodium (MPS) along with prednisolone and tacrolimus, were studied. Extrapolated MPA-AUC0-12h were measured after transplant ( between D5-10, at third month, sixth month, one year, later than one year and ad-hoc)by HPLC and the MMF/MPS dose were adjusted to maintain it between 30-60mg.h/L. The cumulative drug exposure and MPA dose and dose controlled AUC (Dc-AUC = MPA-AUC0-12h/Dosemg/Kg) were calculated up to the day of outcome events (rejections, infections, leucopenia or diarrhea) by applying trapezoidal rule, for the event-cases and respective controls. The difference of the mean cumulative drug exposure and dose between the cases and controls was analyzed. Results: Of the 235 renal allograft recipients (mean age 36.6±12.1 years; M:F=3:1) 90.6% received renal allografts from living related donors (with HLA AB ≥2 Ag match – 66.8%) and 9.4% from deceased donors. Most patients received induction therapy (74.5%)(predominantly basiliximab) and prednisolone with tacrolimus (83.0%) and MMF (51.1%) or MPS (48.9%). The recipients were followed up for a mean of 24.9±13.5 months. The mean serum creatinine (mg/dl) was 1.26±0.50 at 1 month, 1.21±0.32 at 6 months, 1.24±0.38 at 1 year, 1.27±0.41 at 2 years and 1.35±0.1 at 5 years post transplant. Patients switched from MPA to Azathioprine (9.4%) at a median of 4.9 (2.6-38.3) months after transplantation predominantly due to financial reasons (6.8%) and diarrhea (2.6%). At the first week, three months, six months, one year and later than one year respectively, the mean dose were (38.6±8.1, 39.4±13.7, 29.3±9.5, 24.9±8.7 and 24.1±10.1 mg/kg), the mean MPA-AUC0-12h were (38.1±16.5, 59.0±28.1, 56.9±23.9, 52.7±18.3 and 50.3±18.2 mg.h/L). Overall, patients taking MPS achieved significantly higher Dc-AUC than MMF (2.0±1.0 vs. 1.7±1.1 Kg.h/L: p<0.001). The cumulative exposure (MPA-AUC0-12h) till the event was significantly lower among the rejecters (16.5%) compared to the non rejecters (37.5±17.7 vs. 44.5±8.2 mg.h/L: p=0.027), but not the cumulative dose or Dc-AUC. This difference persisted even for early rejections (<3 months: 9.4%) and after controlling for the effect of induction. The cumulative MPA dose and exposure were not significantly different between patients who developed urinary tract infections (20.0%), CMV disease (8.5%), Herpes infections (5.5%), BK virus nephropathy (2.1%), systemic mycoses (2.6%) or leucopenia (21.7%) and their respective controls. However, among patients who developed diarrhea (11.1%) higher cumulative exposure (51.4±22.2 vs. 48.3±6.5 mg.h/L: p=0.494) with a significantly lower cumulative dose (31.8±8.3 vs. 35.7±4.8 mg/kg: p=0.043) was observed. Conclusion: Among Indian renal allograft recipients, despite use of similar weight based dose of MPA salts, patients who achieved lower MPAAUC0-12h (even within therapeutic range of 30-60mg.h/L) were at a higher risk of suffering rejections. Therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA during the early post transplant period is helpful in reducing rejection rates among Indian allograft recipients.
Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:
The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada