2010 - TTS International Congress


This page contains exclusive content for the member of the following sections: TTS. Log in to view.

Options and Outcomes in the Sensitized Kidney Recipient

118.4 - Long-term outcome according to levels of preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies in kidney transplantation

Presenter: Carmen, Lefaucheur, Paris, France
Authors: Lefaucheur C., Loupy A., Hill G., Andrade J., Antoine C., Charron D., Suberbielle C., Glotz D.

LONG-TERM OUTCOME ACCORDING TO LEVELS OF PREFORMED DONOR-SPECIFIC HLA-ANTIBODIES IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION

OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES IN THE SENSITIZED KIDNEY RECIPIENT

C. Lefaucheur1, A. Loupy2, G.S. Hill2, J. Andrade3, C. Antoine1, D. Charron3, C. Suberbielle3, D. Glotz1
1Nephrology And Kidney Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris/FRANCE, 2Histopathology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris/FRANCE, 3Immunology And Histocompatibility, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris/FRANCE

Body: Introduction: The transplantation of patients sensitized to HLA is a major problem in kidney transplantation. The objective of this study is to appraise the clinical impact of the strength of preformed HLA antibodies quantified by contemporary solid-phase assays. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational single-center study analysing the occurrence of acute antibody-mediated rejection and survival of patients and grafts, in kidney transplant patients with pre-existing donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA) detected by Luminex single antigen assays, on the peak and current sera. Between January 1998 and June 2006, 402 consecutive deceased-donor kidney transplants performed in our hospital were enrolled. The patients were eligible to receive a kidney allograft based on a negative NIH lymphocytotoxic crossmatch test the day of transplant. Results: Eight year graft survival of patients with preformed HLA-DSA was significantly worse (60.8%) than in sensitized patients without HLA-DSA (92.5%) and in non-sensitized patients (83.6%, p<.0001). The ROC curves analyses of HLA DSA strength in the prediction of antibody-mediated rejection showed that peak HLA-DSA Luminex mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) had a higher predictive value for acute antibody-mediated rejection than did current HLA-DSA MFI (area under the curve of 0.94 ± 0.02 vs 0.86 ± 0.04 respectively, p=.028). We determined that an MFI of 465 on the peak serum is associated with maximal specificity and sensitivity regarding the occurrence of acute antibody-mediated rejection. The relative risk of acute antibody-mediated rejection increased significantly with increasing MFI of the highest ranked peak HLA-DSA: from 1 for MFI < 465 up to 113 (95% CI, 30.8 to 414; p<.001) for patients with MFI > 6000. Graft survival decreased with rising MFI of the highest ranked HLA-DSA detected on peak pre-graft serum (log rank test, p<.001, Figure). Patients with MFI>3000 have 3.8 increased risk of graft loss than those with MFI<3000 (95% CI, 3.5 to 18.4, p<.0001). These results were also valid in patients without episode of acute antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk of 2.8, 95% CI, 1.5 to 16.9, p=.009). Conclusion: We found an increased risk for both antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss according to peak HLA-DSA strength. The prediction of antibody-mediated rejection was better using peak serum than with current serum. Quantification of these antibodies allows stratification of immunologic risk thus helping to define acceptable grafts in sensitized patients.

Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Important Disclaimer

By viewing the material on this site you understand and accept that:

  1. The opinions and statements expressed on this site reflect the views of the author or authors and do not necessarily reflect those of The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  2. The hosting of material on The Transplantation Society site does not signify endorsement of this material by The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections.
  3. The material is solely for educational purposes for qualified health care professionals.
  4. The Transplantation Society and/or its Sections are not liable for any decision made or action taken based on the information contained in the material on this site.
  5. The information cannot be used as a substitute for professional care.
  6. The information does not represent a standard of care.
  7. No physician-patient relationship is being established.

Social

Contact

Staff Directory
+1-514-874-1717
info@tts.org

Address

The Transplantation Society
International Headquarters
740 Notre-Dame Ouest
Suite 1245
Montréal, QC, H3C 3X6
Canada